Posts Tagged ‘Life Insurance’

Insurance Companies Get To Grips With Protection Insurance

October 26th, 2009

Summary:
Protection Insurance is a necessary product, will it become more popular? The insurance industry is at last making the right moves. We are hoping that they succeed. This article gives a clear explanation.

Not manyprofessional financial advisors would’nt disagree that life insurance should be the basis of most family’s financial planning whether it’s safeguarding against the detriment of early death, accident, long term illness or (particularly now with the arrival of the credit crunch), cover for unemployment.

Online life insurance cover is rightly the foundation of financial planning whether it be used to protect your home owner loan or provide a tax free lump sum for your family in the event of your demise. Unhappily, some other kinds of protection cover have a less desirable reputation. Payment Protection Insurance Cover has a reputation for being miss-sold and critical illness insurance has historically suffered from rampant policy exclusions which allowed the insurers to reject an extremely large number of claims, even if they appear valid.

But last week a glimmer of light transpired when Standard Life made known its 1st 1/2 figures on the resulteffect of claims on its critical illness policies. These numbers seem to mean that at last the question of unintentional disclosure of health details when the policy application is completed, is being resolved.

Only a few years ago critical illness cover claims were being constantly turned down on the merest suggestion that the client had omitted any slight medical condition – even a foot infection or a sore throat! Consistent with the figures reported by Standard Life, their claim rejections have fallen sharply from 6.8 per cent last year to 1.5 per cent in the previous 6 months.

Why is this? Norwich Union, Friends Provident, Scottish Provident, Axa, LV, and Scottish Equitable  have put forward a variety of alterations intended to diminish their refusal rates. They begin with an utterly obvious explanation of the importance of complete health disclosure right down to when they last visited their Doctor no matter how slight the reason. And some insurers such as Legal and General get a medically trained person to phone each potential client to talk through their health history in more detail. Then when the insurance policy goes on risk, some insurance companies are telling again the insurance holders of the requirement of full medical disclosure and allowing them the chance of adding or correcting the details on their submission form.

If the additional details are assessed as increasing the insurer’s risk, then the insurer will certainlywithout doubt increase the monthly premium – but that is definitely far better than paying the original premium for years and years and then getting a claim refused.

The insurers should have taken path a long time ago as their softly, softly method has dented the public’s perception of protection cover. After all there is an absolute need for protection cover so let us pray that it achieves the reputation its so richly deserves.

Insurers Tackle Protection Insurance

September 28th, 2009

Summary
Protection Insurance is a necessary product, will it become more popular? The insurance industry is at last making the right moves. We hope that they are successful. Read this article to find out what is now happening in the insurance market.

Not Many expert financial advisors would dispute that protection insurance cover should be the foundation of most peoples financial planning whether it’s protection against the damage of premature death, cover for unemployment (particulary now with the arrival of the credit crunch), long term illness or accident.

Life assurance is rightly the bed rock of financial preparation whether it be put in place to cover your home owner loan or provide a tax free lump sum for your dependants in the event of your demise. Alas, some other forms of protection insurance have a less desirable reputation. Payment Protection insurance has a name for being miss-sold and critical illness cover has formally suffered from extensive policy exclusions which make it possible for the insurers to decline a high proportion of claims, even if they seem authentic.

But last month a shimmer of light materialised when Scottish Provident made known its first 1/2 figures on the outcome of claims on its critical illness policies. These numbers appear to signify that at last the problem of unintended disclosure of health particulars when the policy application is concluded, is being resolved.

Not long ago critical illness cover claims were being routinely rejected on the merest suggestion that the client had omitted any slight medical detail – even a foot infection or a sore throat! In line with the figures reported by Legal and General, their claim refusals have dropped sharply from 6.8 per cent last year to 1.7% in the previous 6 months.

Why has this happened? Norwich Union, Friends Provident, Scottish Provident, Axa, LV, and Scottish Equitable  have put forward a range of adjustments planned to reduce their refusal rates. They start off with an utterly obvious explanation of the magnitude of complete medical disclosure right down to when they last saw their Doctor no matter how inconsequential the cause. And some insurers such as Axa get a medically trained person to telephone each potential client to discuss their medical history in detail. Then when the life insurance quote goes on risk, some companies are telling again the policyholders of the requirement of full medical revelation and giving them the option of correcting or adding the information on their application.

If the latest details are assessed as increasing the insurer’s risk, then the insurance company will inevitably increase the monthly premium– but that’s surely far better than paying the original payment for years and then having a claim rejected.

The insurance companies should have taken route years ago as their softly, softly style has dented the consumer’s assessment of protection insurance cover. Nevertheless there is an unquestionableneed for protection insurance so let us hope that it gets the popularity its so rightly deserves.

Big On Small Print, Low On Cover

September 16th, 2009

Summary
The need for clarity and honesty when writing critical illness insurance policies. Read this article to understand.

Nothing is more disturbing in life than to be diagnosed with a serious or severe condition. Matters are made a thousand times worse when your insurer tells you that they will not pay out on your critical illness cover or private health insurance for the Cancer or HIV you are suffering from .

You are told to peruse sub-clause four of paragraph 325 of the small print, which informs you that you have got the  wrong type of cancer. Only tumours below the knee are covered and only the first five days of your treatment will be paid for, then it is up to you to find the money.

This situation may sound absurd, but even though insurers and brokers are regulated, this type of procedure continues togo on. It has been a long drawn process to clean up the industry and to ensure consumers get a proper deal.

A short time ago Cancer Backup, a well known charity, emphasizes this problem by arranging a wide ranging mystery shopping surveys, which exposed some disturbing facts about the private health insurance companies. It discovered that of nearly all the leading insurers only PPP gave cover for cancer patients throughout the period of their illness. Only  the initial treatment is covered by most of the health insurance companies. Care or treatment over a prolongedperiod of time, such as hormone replacement or chemotherapy is normally excluded.

Even though insurance companies and brokers want to finance long term cover for policyholders with severe illnesses, they won’t always make it clear to likely clients, at the time of taking out the policy what they are covered for.

While both  Cancer Backup and Macmillan Cancer support have been in consultation with comparableestablishments within the industry to raise the standard of sales practices and make the phrasing of policy documents much clearer, progress has been slow since the report was published two years ago.

Critical illness cover and private medical insurance  is normally taken out by people who are quite hale and hearty. The last thing that crosses their minds is getting cancer. That is why it is so essential to specify a policy’s exclusions before they sign.

A report of best practice for insurance companies writing and selling medical policies has been updated recently by the Association of British Insurers, which is a much needed step in the proper direction.

The market body has now suggested that insurance companies and providers selling these kinds of insurance should orchestrate similar case studies, which clarifies the circumstances when an insurance policy will or will not be paid. Sadly insurers no requirement to adhere to this code, which is voluntary.

Although the ABI’s initiative is to be welcomed, the best way of amplifying an insurance policy is by getting the salesman to explicate the small print.

In addition, industry terminology is in spite of everything even now being used by insurance companies to confuse the consumer. For example it is wrong to grade cancer as an acute or chronic illness, deliberates Cancer Backup. However insurers are resolute that it should go in the chronic category. clients are only informed about this when their claim is rejected.

Although the ABI have got their responsibilities right, the insurance companies can only be forced to better their standards by the regulator. Better training of tele marketing staff, who sell the majority of the policies, is also long overdue.

More precise marketing procedures are needed with jargon being removed. Ultimately it remains the responsibility of the insurersinsurance companies to ensure that their customers are fully aware of the terms of their insurance cover before they commit themselves.